|
Recent Reports
June 18, 2008
Licensing,
Accreditation, or Certification?
"It is important to understand,
however, that professional licensure usually arises from within a
particular industry whose leaders and members decide that restricting the
size of the labor market, as well as the credentials needed to gain entry,
will be beneficial for all. By keeping out and kicking out “undesirables,”
licensing is thought to help elevate the perceived reputation and salaries
of those on the inside."
May 21, 2008
Should States Charge for Forensic Services?
"Invariably, cutbacks seem to always
weigh heavy on publicly funded crime laboratories despite their critical
importance in helping to ensure public safety. And as budget conditions
worsen, some states resort to drastic measures only to learn that their
crime laboratories are more valuable than they thought."
April 24, 2008
An interview with Kevin
Lothridge (NFSTC)
"Our
journey has been a series of challenges that have most often become
opportunities. NFSTC is based on a new concept in the forensic community –
a non-volunteer based organization that is not membership fee driven. We
have consistently employed the approach of exploring new territory while using
innovative solutions to smooth the potholes that all endeavors face."
March 14, 2008
Staff existing
crime labs before building new ones
"Before
cities, counties, or regions take on the enormous challenge of creating their
own laboratories, we’d like to suggest an alternative: they might be better off
simply funding new positions in existing state laboratories. In exchange, these
new hires can be assigned to process the evidence of the contributing
jurisdiction’s cases. When the backlog from that jurisdiction is eliminated, the
staff can be temporarily redirected to work cases from other areas. It’s a
win-win situation."
February 7, 2008
"Innocence Politics" weighs heavy on Senate hearing
"Crime Lab
Report recognizes that improvements can likely be made in how the Office
of Justice Programs conducts its business. The same probably holds true for
just about every other federal agency. But we also believe that NIJ has
largely served the public well in its support of forensic scientists and has
acted with a degree of urgency that is appropriate for the overwhelming
challenges that many public crime laboratories face on a daily basis."
January 16, 2008
MSNBC
misses real story in forensic-failure series
"MSNBC should have named its
documentary "Blind Science / Failed Justice" to underscore the danger of
disrespecting the complexities of scientific evidence. Unfortunately for
viewers, MSNBC opted to seduce its audience with a more scandalous title that
openly contrasts with TV viewers' ongoing love-affair with forensic science."
December 20, 2007
Low-bid accreditation will doom forensic science
"A true and effective accreditation program forces
crime laboratories to subordinate themselves to the standards and scrutiny
of the forensic science community - not the other way around. Egotists
in the profession who cringe at the thought of subjecting themselves to this
kind of "indignity" should either join and converse with their more
fair-minded colleagues or find another line of work."
November 8, 2007
Many are to blame for Maryland Judge's Ruling
"Latent Fingerprint Identification is
a sound and reliable science in need of more competent representation when it
comes under serious attack. We hope forensic science professionals in all
disciplines will allow themselves to be motivated by Judge Souder's ruling and
develop more effective strategies for presenting themselves and their methods in
court. "
October 17, 2007
Crime lab directors show class and heart
"Crime laboratory directors are the
foundation for all of forensic science and are therefore critical to the
functioning of our entire criminal justice system. Rarely do we hear about
them, but it is under their watch that science is so frequently and reliably
applied to solve even the most baffling and horrific criminal cases."
September 24, 2007
The Innocence Project has questions to answer
"Holding public
institutions accountable for their actions is a civic responsibility;
however, the Innocence Project's claim that forensic science is an
unregulated profession is patently dishonest and ignores the collective
oversight provided by trial judges, opposing counselors, appellate courts,
crime laboratory administrators, accreditation inspectors, and, in some
cases, special prosecutors in protecting the integrity of the adjudicative
process from junk science and corrupt witnesses."
|
|
LIBRARY |
STUDIES & SURVEYS |
Monthly Report
Supplemental Reports
Editorials (Printer Friendly PDF)
Articles
Top Web Links |
2008 Forensic Science Salary Study. |
|
EDITORIAL
BOARD |
SPECIAL
FEATURES |
Board Members
Join the Board
Submit a Paper
Submission Rules
|
Mechanics of Crime Labs
Quotes in the News
The Student Section
|
|
INSIDE CRIME LABS |
MEDIA (coming
soon) |
Accreditation
Myths
Problems in Laboratories
Preventing Junk Science
Case Studies |
Download our media kit
Register your company
About our subscribers
|
News
From Washington, D.C.
Supreme Court will take case addressing crime
lab testimony
"The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether prosecutors can use
crime lab reports as evidence without having the forensic analyst
who prepared them testify at trial."
CFSO Chairman, Pete Marone testifies before
the House Judiciary Committee in Washington, D.C.
"Unfortunately, this increase in backlog and caseload has not been
accompanied by a commensurate increase in funding for our labs. It
is difficult to obtain funding to cover both the large numbers of
new cases that are being presented to our labs daily and the backlog
of cases from the past that require a timely review."
Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL) criticizes the
National Institute of Justice during a hearing on the Department of
Justice budget.
"Mr. Attorney General, it has been brought to my attention that
individuals at the National Institute of Justice have attempted to
derail Fiscal Year 2006 report language that I requested, directing
the National Academy of Sciences to conduct an independent forensics
study. Once completed, this study will produce an unbiased and
independent assessment of the present and future needs of the
forensics community, providing a roadmap for best practices."
Publication
Schedule
Main
Report
Published on the 3rd Wednesday of each month.
Our main publication is distributed, free of charge. It is a
comprehensive analysis that includes a variety of features
including commentary by Crime Lab Report editors or
guest authors.
Main reports are archived for
the convenience of our readers. Editorials are
archived separately in a printer-friendly format to
facilitate research and teaching.
Supplemental News Report
Published on the 1st Wednesday of each month.
Our supplemental news report is
a special news and announcements publication created
especially for forensic science organizations in the United
States. It is designed to help busy forensic scientists stay
connected to current trends affecting their profession.
Supplemental news reports are
not permanently archived. |
|